CASE FILE — HERMES-20260422-0247
WHO
Witnesses: no
Feeling: shaken
WHAT
Description: [First seen] Bright orange light.
[What it did] Hovered about 30 seconds, then shot sideways.
[How it ended] Blinked out.
Shape: — ·
Color: — ·
Light character: —
Intensity: — ·
Duration: 10_60s ·
Behavior: —
WHEN
Date: 2026-04-22
02:47
CST
Submitted (UTC): 2026-04-23T20:31:50.886277
WHERE
Location: I-80 east of Ogallala, Nebraska
Lat/Lon: 41.128,
-101.719
(precision: coarse)
Facing: 47.0° ·
Elevation angle: 32.0° ·
Elevation: — ft
WHY
Weather: Clear ·
57.5°F ·
wind 3.4 mph
240.0 ·
humidity 39.75%
Satellites overhead: 5
(['NOAA 5', 'RADIO ROSTO', 'ELEKTRO-L', 'FOSSASAT2E21', 'W-SERIES 4'])
Aircraft overhead: —
(Live data only)
HOW
Camera: — ·
IR: — ·
Naked eye: yes
Intake schema version:
v2
STATUS: OPEN conventional explanation possible but unconfirmed
CONFIDENCE BAND: MEDIUM
"Confidence" describes how thoroughly this case has been checked against conventional explanations not how likely a specific interpretation is to be true.
Observation
Date / Time2026-04-22 02:47 CST
LocationI-80 east of Ogallala, Nebraska
Coordinates41.128, -101.719
Observer elevation0.0 ft
Facing (bearing)47.0
Elevation angle32.0
Description
Color
Shape
Intensity
Light character
Duration10_60s
Witnessesno
Witness statement
[First seen] Bright orange light.
[What it did] Hovered about 30 seconds, then shot sideways.
[How it ended] Blinked out.
3D scene reconstruction deterministic, post-submit, no AI interpretation
This is a Sitrec reconstruction of the witness's stated viewpoint at the stated time.
Witness position, facing, elevation angle, terrain, sky bodies, and ADS-B aircraft are placed
deterministically from case fields. The described object itself is NOT rendered
(perception is not measurable pose). Composed 2026-05-16T03:48:13Z.
Open scene full-screen
·
sitch md5: ed265d955d59c201b28ae84a36e3193b
Evidence Score
+0.18
Leans-Unexplained
score v0.14.0
The Evidence Score is +0.18 (Leans-Unexplained). 5 rule(s) contributed, with the net weight indicating that checked conventional explanations are collectively weakened.
CONTRIBUTION LEDGER (13 rules)
| Rule |
Bucket |
Verdict |
Raw |
Applied |
Reason |
| WX-CLOUD-01 |
weather |
eliminated |
+0.100 |
+0.100
|
full |
| WX-WIND-01 |
weather |
eliminated |
+0.050 |
+0.050
|
full |
| AC-DENSITY-01 |
aircraft |
eliminated |
+0.080 |
+0.080
|
full |
| SAT-OVER-01 |
satellites |
indeterminate |
— |
—
|
informational |
| SAT-LOS-01 |
satellites |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| CEL-AVAIL-00 |
celestial |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| CORR-01 |
corroboration |
passed |
+0.050 |
+0.050
|
full |
| GEO-DIST-01 |
geometry |
indeterminate |
— |
—
|
informational |
| GEO-WITNESS-01 |
geometry |
flagged |
-0.100 |
-0.100
|
full |
| PROV-01 |
provenance |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| FP-01 |
fingerprint |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| EXC-01 |
exclusion |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| AI-01 |
ai_signals |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational:ai_signals |
Score range [-1, +1]. Negative = conventional explanations plausible; positive = conventional explanations collectively weakened.
Score is informational only. It does not identify or characterise the phenomenon.
Score methodology →
Audit trail methodology 0.16.0 generated 2026-06-09T06:11:31.319784Z
eliminated: 3
flagged: 1
indeterminate: 2
no data: 6
audit-hash: D54760DB83094F38
Each rule below shows its inputs, the data source queried, the result, and the verdict. Every rule has a stable ID so this case can be cited and replayed as the methodology evolves.
WEATHER
WX-CLOUD-01 v0.16.0
Cloud cover eliminates reflection/refraction
eliminated
Cloud cover was 0%. Clear sky makes cloud-based reflections or refractions an unlikely explanation for the sighting.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"observed_at": "2026-04-22 02:47",
"ok": true,
"provider": "Visual Crossing historical",
"station_or_grid": "nearest-grid"
}
inputs
{
"cloud_cover_pct": 0.0
}
result
{
"clear_sky": true
}
confidence effect: +0.10
WX-WIND-01 v0.16.0
Low wind eliminates buoyancy drift
eliminated
Surface wind was 3 mph. Sky lanterns and free balloons drift visibly in wind above ~10 mph, so low wind makes buoyant-object explanations less persuasive unless the object was observed to drift.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"observed_at": "2026-04-22 02:47",
"ok": true,
"provider": "Visual Crossing historical",
"station_or_grid": "nearest-grid"
}
inputs
{
"wind_mph": 3.4
}
result
{
"calm": true
}
confidence effect: +0.05
AIRCRAFT
AC-DENSITY-01 v0.16.0
Low local air traffic
eliminated
Only 0 aircraft were operating within 50 nm at report intake. Commercial traffic is not a strong candidate, though historical ADS-B backfill is still recommended for definitive exclusion.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "ADS-B here is a live snapshot at report intake, not historical playback. Historical ADS-B backfill is planned (see changelog 0.5.0).",
"ok": true,
"provider": "ADS-B live snapshot (50 nm radius, current)"
}
inputs
{
"count": 0,
"radius_nm": 50
}
result
{
"aircraft_nearby": 0
}
confidence effect: +0.08
SATELLITES
SAT-OVER-01 v0.16.0
Satellites in wide overhead cone
indeterminate
5 catalogued objects were in the wide overhead cone at intake time. Without the observer's look-direction and elevation, this is an availability count -- not an elimination. A TLE-based exact-line-of-sight check is planned.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "Live snapshot at report intake, not historical propagation. TLE-based historical reconstruction is a planned upgrade.",
"ok": true,
"provider": "N2YO /above endpoint (0-70 degrees elevation, 18 category)"
}
inputs
{
"elevation_band_deg": "0-70"
}
result
{
"count": 5,
"notable_sample": [
"NOAA 5",
"RADIO ROSTO",
"ELEKTRO-L",
"FOSSASAT2E21",
"W-SERIES 4"
]
}
SAT-LOS-01 v0.16.0
Satellite line of sight (TLE-propagated)
no data
TLE cache stale (47.0 days old; max 7d)
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "TLE age 1127.2h; catalog ?",
"ok": false,
"provider": "CelesTrak GP (stations + visual) via sgp4"
}
inputs
{
"lat": 41.128,
"lon": -101.719,
"reported_az_deg": 47.0,
"reported_el_deg": 32.0,
"tolerances": null,
"utc": "2026-04-22T02:47:00"
}
result
{
"illumination": null,
"match_count": null,
"rule_hash": null,
"satellites_above_horizon": null,
"top_candidates": []
}
CELESTIAL BODIES
CEL-AVAIL-00 v0.16.0
Celestial computation availability
no data
Celestial computation did not run (missing or invalid timezone/timestamp). Moon, planet, and twilight checks were skipped.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"computed_at_utc": null,
"ok": false,
"provider": "ephem (PyEphem) local computation"
}
inputs
{
"timezone": "CST"
}
result
{
"ran": false
}
GEOMETRY
GEO-DIST-01 v0.16.0
Apparent-altitude ladder
indeterminate
For the reported elevation angle, Hermes computed the apparent object altitude at several candidate distances. Without an independent distance estimate, any single point on this ladder is plausible -- but the ladder as a whole shows what conventional explanations the geometry admits.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "trigonometric calc"
}
inputs
{
"elevation_angle_deg": 32.0,
"observer_elev_ft": 0.0
}
result
{
"distance_vs_altitude_table": [
{
"altitude_ft": 10251,
"distance_km": 5
},
{
"altitude_ft": 20502,
"distance_km": 10
},
{
"altitude_ft": 51255,
"distance_km": 25
},
{
"altitude_ft": 102510,
"distance_km": 50
},
{
"altitude_ft": 205020,
"distance_km": 100
}
]
}
GEO-WITNESS-01 v0.16.0
Witness standpoint geometry
flagged
Witness standpoint geometry is absent and no alternative anchor is present (no EXIF GPS, no corroborating witness, no calibrated camera). Confidence effect: -10%. The optional map step on the intake form can provide this anchor.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "witness report + Hermes case data"
}
inputs
{
"camera_calibrated": false,
"corroborated": false,
"exif_gps_present": false,
"witness_geometry_present": false
}
result
{
"excuses": {
"camera_calibrated": false,
"corroborated": false,
"exif_gps": false
},
"geometry_present": false
}
confidence effect: -0.10
CORROBORATION
CORR-01 v0.16.0
Corroboration cluster (spatio-temporal)
passed
No corroborating reports within 30 min and 50 km (scanned 11 cases).
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "scanned 11 cases",
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes native case store"
}
inputs
{
"lat": 41.128,
"lon": -101.719,
"tolerances": {
"radius_km": 50.0,
"window_min": 30
},
"when_utc": "2026-04-22T02:47:00"
}
result
{
"cluster_size": 0,
"matches": [],
"nearest_km": null,
"nearest_minutes": null,
"rule_hash": "E8F04C312792FF1C"
}
confidence effect: +0.05
FILE PROVENANCE
PROV-01 v0.16.0
Provenance record present
no data
No provenance record is attached to this case. Either no media was uploaded, or this case was submitted before the v0.10.0 provenance pipeline was active. Backfill is a planned future operation.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes media pipeline"
}
inputs
{
"provenance_present": false
}
result
{
"present": false
}
PERCEPTUAL FINGERPRINTING
FP-01 v0.16.0
Fingerprint recorded
no data
No perceptual fingerprint is attached to this case. Either no media was uploaded, or this case was submitted before the v0.11.0 fingerprint pipeline was active. Backfill is a planned operator-triggered task.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes fingerprint pipeline"
}
inputs
{
"fingerprint_present": false
}
result
{
"present": false
}
KNOWN-OBJECT EXCLUSION
EXC-01 v0.16.0
Exclusion engine ran
no data
The exclusion engine has not run on this case. Either no media was uploaded, or the case lacks sufficient grounding (usable timestamp and location). See EXC-01 preconditions for details.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes exclusion engine"
}
inputs
{
"exclusion_results_present": false
}
result
{
"ran": false,
"reason": "no exclusion_results on case"
}
AI-PROVENANCE SIGNALS
AI-01 v0.16.0
AI-provenance signal panel ran
no data
The AI-provenance signal panel has not run on this case. Either no media has been uploaded or provenance extraction failed.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes AI-provenance pipeline"
}
inputs
{
"ai_signals_present": false
}
result
{
"ran": false,
"reason": "no ai_signals on provenance record"
}
- This audit trail lists each rule Hermes evaluated, the data it used, and the outcome. It is not a judgement about the underlying phenomenon.
- Hermes is an analysis and triage platform. Confidence scores describe how thoroughly a case has been checked against conventional explanations, not how likely a given interpretation is to be true.
- Live satellite and aircraft snapshots reflect intake time, not the exact sighting moment. Historical backfill (TLE propagation, historical ADS-B) is a pending methodology upgrade.
- Witness-reported kinematics (hovering, acceleration, instantaneous turns) are preserved verbatim but not treated as instrumented measurements.