CASE FILE — HERMES-20250907-0002
WHO
Witnesses: No
Feeling: —
WHAT
Description: Object appeared yellow/golden in color, elongated, no visible tail. This was the third time I had seen it in a 10 day span
Shape: Elongated / cigar ·
Color: Yellow ·
Light character: Steady
Intensity: Very bright ·
Duration: 1 ·
Behavior: Steady / Linear
WHEN
Date: 2025-09-07
00:02
EST
Submitted (UTC): 2026-04-23T22:08:15.489202
WHERE
Location: Bonita Springs Florida
Lat/Lon: 81.797,
26.3735
(precision: coarse)
Facing: 156.0° ·
Elevation angle: 47.0° ·
Elevation: 26.0 ft
WHY
Weather: Overcast ·
35.3°F ·
wind 13.4 mph
28.0 ·
humidity 93.75%
Satellites overhead: 19
(['RADIO 7', 'OPAL', 'CUBESAT XI-V', 'ITUPSAT 1', 'APRIZESAT 9', 'APRIZESAT 10', 'NLS 7.2/CANX 5', 'S-NET C'])
Aircraft overhead: —
(Live data only)
HOW
Camera: other (describe in notes) ·
IR: No ·
Naked eye: Yes
Intake schema version:
v2
STATUS: OPEN anomalous characteristics noted
CONFIDENCE BAND: MEDIUM-HIGH
"Confidence" describes how thoroughly this case has been checked against conventional explanations not how likely a specific interpretation is to be true.
Observation
Date / Time2025-09-07 00:02 EST
LocationBonita Springs Florida
Coordinates81.797, 26.3735
Observer elevation26.0 ft
Facing (bearing)156.0
Elevation angle47.0
Description
ColorYellow
ShapeElongated / cigar
IntensityVery bright
Light characterSteady
Duration1
WitnessesNo
Witness statement
Object appeared yellow/golden in color, elongated, no visible tail. This was the third time I had seen it in a 10 day span
3D scene reconstruction deterministic, post-submit, no AI interpretation
This is a Sitrec reconstruction of the witness's stated viewpoint at the stated time.
Witness position, facing, elevation angle, terrain, sky bodies, and ADS-B aircraft are placed
deterministically from case fields. The described object itself is NOT rendered
(perception is not measurable pose). Composed 2026-05-16T03:48:13Z.
Open scene full-screen
·
sitch md5: aee5fd00ab25a945399120f93b9ae2d3
Evidence Score
-0.07
Inconclusive
score v0.14.0
The Evidence Score is -0.07 (Inconclusive). 4 rule(s) contributed non-zero weight, but the positive and negative signals roughly balance, leaving the case inconclusive.
CONTRIBUTION LEDGER (13 rules)
| Rule |
Bucket |
Verdict |
Raw |
Applied |
Reason |
| WX-CLOUD-01 |
weather |
flagged |
-0.100 |
-0.100
|
full |
| AC-DENSITY-01 |
aircraft |
eliminated |
+0.080 |
+0.080
|
full |
| SAT-OVER-01 |
satellites |
indeterminate |
— |
—
|
informational |
| SAT-LOS-01 |
satellites |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| CEL-AVAIL-00 |
celestial |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| OBS-COLOR-01 |
observation |
indeterminate |
— |
—
|
informational |
| CORR-01 |
corroboration |
passed |
+0.050 |
+0.050
|
full |
| GEO-DIST-01 |
geometry |
indeterminate |
— |
—
|
informational |
| GEO-WITNESS-01 |
geometry |
flagged |
-0.100 |
-0.100
|
full |
| PROV-01 |
provenance |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| FP-01 |
fingerprint |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| EXC-01 |
exclusion |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational |
| AI-01 |
ai_signals |
no_data |
— |
—
|
informational:ai_signals |
Score range [-1, +1]. Negative = conventional explanations plausible; positive = conventional explanations collectively weakened.
Score is informational only. It does not identify or characterise the phenomenon.
Score methodology →
Audit trail methodology 0.16.0 generated 2026-06-09T06:10:46.149401Z
eliminated: 1
flagged: 2
indeterminate: 3
no data: 6
audit-hash: 9DA3A4ED5DB72BA6
Each rule below shows its inputs, the data source queried, the result, and the verdict. Every rule has a stable ID so this case can be cited and replayed as the methodology evolves.
WEATHER
WX-CLOUD-01 v0.16.0
Cloud cover allows reflection/refraction
flagged
Cloud cover was 100%. Light from ground sources (searchlights, stadium lighting) can reflect off overcast and produce unusual appearances.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"observed_at": "2025-09-07 00:02",
"ok": true,
"provider": "Visual Crossing historical",
"station_or_grid": "nearest-grid"
}
inputs
{
"cloud_cover_pct": 100.0
}
result
{
"overcast": true
}
confidence effect: -0.10
AIRCRAFT
AC-DENSITY-01 v0.16.0
Low local air traffic
eliminated
Only 0 aircraft were operating within 50 nm at report intake. Commercial traffic is not a strong candidate, though historical ADS-B backfill is still recommended for definitive exclusion.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "ADS-B here is a live snapshot at report intake, not historical playback. Historical ADS-B backfill is planned (see changelog 0.5.0).",
"ok": true,
"provider": "ADS-B live snapshot (50 nm radius, current)"
}
inputs
{
"count": 0,
"radius_nm": 50
}
result
{
"aircraft_nearby": 0
}
confidence effect: +0.08
SATELLITES
SAT-OVER-01 v0.16.0
Satellites in wide overhead cone
indeterminate
19 catalogued objects were in the wide overhead cone at intake time. Without the observer's look-direction and elevation, this is an availability count -- not an elimination. A TLE-based exact-line-of-sight check is planned.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "Live snapshot at report intake, not historical propagation. TLE-based historical reconstruction is a planned upgrade.",
"ok": true,
"provider": "N2YO /above endpoint (0-70 degrees elevation, 18 category)"
}
inputs
{
"elevation_band_deg": "0-70"
}
result
{
"count": 19,
"notable_sample": [
"RADIO 7",
"OPAL",
"CUBESAT XI-V",
"ITUPSAT 1",
"APRIZESAT 9",
"APRIZESAT 10",
"NLS 7.2/CANX 5",
"S-NET C"
]
}
SAT-LOS-01 v0.16.0
Satellite line of sight (TLE-propagated)
no data
TLE cache stale (47.0 days old; max 7d)
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "TLE age 1127.2h; catalog ?",
"ok": false,
"provider": "CelesTrak GP (stations + visual) via sgp4"
}
inputs
{
"lat": 81.797,
"lon": 26.3735,
"reported_az_deg": 156.0,
"reported_el_deg": 47.0,
"tolerances": null,
"utc": "2025-09-07T00:02:00"
}
result
{
"illumination": null,
"match_count": null,
"rule_hash": null,
"satellites_above_horizon": null,
"top_candidates": []
}
CELESTIAL BODIES
CEL-AVAIL-00 v0.16.0
Celestial computation availability
no data
Celestial computation did not run (missing or invalid timezone/timestamp). Moon, planet, and twilight checks were skipped.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"computed_at_utc": null,
"ok": false,
"provider": "ephem (PyEphem) local computation"
}
inputs
{
"timezone": "EST"
}
result
{
"ran": false
}
WITNESS OBSERVATION
OBS-COLOR-01 v0.16.0
Color signature: yellow
indeterminate
Reported color does not match a standard elimination pattern; retained for further review.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "witness report"
}
inputs
{
"color": "yellow"
}
result
{
"matches_known_signature": false
}
GEOMETRY
GEO-DIST-01 v0.16.0
Apparent-altitude ladder
indeterminate
For the reported elevation angle, Hermes computed the apparent object altitude at several candidate distances. Without an independent distance estimate, any single point on this ladder is plausible -- but the ladder as a whole shows what conventional explanations the geometry admits.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "trigonometric calc"
}
inputs
{
"elevation_angle_deg": 47.0,
"observer_elev_ft": 26.0
}
result
{
"distance_vs_altitude_table": [
{
"altitude_ft": 17618,
"distance_km": 5
},
{
"altitude_ft": 35210,
"distance_km": 10
},
{
"altitude_ft": 87987,
"distance_km": 25
},
{
"altitude_ft": 175948,
"distance_km": 50
},
{
"altitude_ft": 351870,
"distance_km": 100
}
]
}
GEO-WITNESS-01 v0.16.0
Witness standpoint geometry
flagged
Witness standpoint geometry is absent and no alternative anchor is present (no EXIF GPS, no corroborating witness, no calibrated camera). Confidence effect: -10%. The optional map step on the intake form can provide this anchor.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "witness report + Hermes case data"
}
inputs
{
"camera_calibrated": false,
"corroborated": false,
"exif_gps_present": false,
"witness_geometry_present": false
}
result
{
"excuses": {
"camera_calibrated": false,
"corroborated": false,
"exif_gps": false
},
"geometry_present": false
}
confidence effect: -0.10
CORROBORATION
CORR-01 v0.16.0
Corroboration cluster (spatio-temporal)
passed
No corroborating reports within 30 min and 50 km (scanned 11 cases).
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"note": "scanned 11 cases",
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes native case store"
}
inputs
{
"lat": 81.797,
"lon": 26.3735,
"tolerances": {
"radius_km": 50.0,
"window_min": 30
},
"when_utc": "2025-09-07T00:02:00"
}
result
{
"cluster_size": 0,
"matches": [],
"nearest_km": null,
"nearest_minutes": null,
"rule_hash": "D6C6EAB9D86B0883"
}
confidence effect: +0.05
FILE PROVENANCE
PROV-01 v0.16.0
Provenance record present
no data
No provenance record is attached to this case. Either no media was uploaded, or this case was submitted before the v0.10.0 provenance pipeline was active. Backfill is a planned future operation.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes media pipeline"
}
inputs
{
"provenance_present": false
}
result
{
"present": false
}
PERCEPTUAL FINGERPRINTING
FP-01 v0.16.0
Fingerprint recorded
no data
No perceptual fingerprint is attached to this case. Either no media was uploaded, or this case was submitted before the v0.11.0 fingerprint pipeline was active. Backfill is a planned operator-triggered task.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes fingerprint pipeline"
}
inputs
{
"fingerprint_present": false
}
result
{
"present": false
}
KNOWN-OBJECT EXCLUSION
EXC-01 v0.16.0
Exclusion engine ran
no data
The exclusion engine has not run on this case. Either no media was uploaded, or the case lacks sufficient grounding (usable timestamp and location). See EXC-01 preconditions for details.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes exclusion engine"
}
inputs
{
"exclusion_results_present": false
}
result
{
"ran": false,
"reason": "no exclusion_results on case"
}
AI-PROVENANCE SIGNALS
AI-01 v0.16.0
AI-provenance signal panel ran
no data
The AI-provenance signal panel has not run on this case. Either no media has been uploaded or provenance extraction failed.
Show inputs data source raw result
data source
{
"ok": true,
"provider": "Hermes AI-provenance pipeline"
}
inputs
{
"ai_signals_present": false
}
result
{
"ran": false,
"reason": "no ai_signals on provenance record"
}
- This audit trail lists each rule Hermes evaluated, the data it used, and the outcome. It is not a judgement about the underlying phenomenon.
- Hermes is an analysis and triage platform. Confidence scores describe how thoroughly a case has been checked against conventional explanations, not how likely a given interpretation is to be true.
- Live satellite and aircraft snapshots reflect intake time, not the exact sighting moment. Historical backfill (TLE propagation, historical ADS-B) is a pending methodology upgrade.
- Witness-reported kinematics (hovering, acceleration, instantaneous turns) are preserved verbatim but not treated as instrumented measurements.